Compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric dating who is dating michael weatherly

Posted by / 12-Jan-2020 05:45

Absolute dating supplies a numerical date whilst relative dating places events in time-sequence; both are scientifically useful.

This is based upon the spontaneous breakdown or decay of atomic nuclei.

One early approach was based upon ocean salinity [John Joly, 1800's].

This assumed the ocean was initially pure water and that it's salinity was derived from continental erosion.

More recently, work has been done on ocean sediments [S. This suggests that, given the current annual rates of erosion (some 27.5 billion tons), all earth's continents would be delivered into the oceans in just 14 million years.

Some claim Genesis in particular, and the Bible in general looks mythical from this standpoint.

A full discussion of the topic must therefore include the current scientific challenge to the OE concept.

The time required for half the original number of parent atoms to decay is called the half life.

Some half-lives are listed below: It follows that uranium-lead, potassium-argon (K-Ar), and Rubidium-Strontium (Rb-Sr) decay can be used for very long time periods, whilst radiocarbon dating can only be used up to about 70,000 years. This uses a simple exponential decay formula linking the original number, Po, of parent atoms in rocks and minerals to the P atoms now present, thereby enabling an estimate of geological age.

compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric dating-79compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric dating-20compare and contrast relative age dating with radiometric dating-49

Mathematically, P = Po exp(-lambda T), where lambda = the decay constant and T = the period of decay. a zero initial number of D atoms, where P(or D) = the current number of P(or D) atoms, it follows that the age of a rock or mineral is computed as T=(1/lambda)ln(1 D/P).